Reuters
Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:48pm EDT
Results from tests on genetic material from alleged remains of one of the mythical half-ape and half-human creatures, made public at a news conference on Friday held after the claimed discovery swept the Internet, failed to prove its existence.
Its spread was fueled by a photograph of a hairy heap, bearing a close resemblance to a shaggy full-body gorilla costume, stuffed into a container resembling a refrigerator.
One of the two samples of DNA said to prove the existence of the Bigfoot came from a human and the other was 96 percent from an opossum, according to Curt Nelson, a scientist at the University of Minnesota who performed the DNA analysis.
Bigfoot creatures are said to live in the forests of the U.S. Pacific Northwest. An opossum is a marsupial about the size of a house cat.
Results of the DNA tests were revealed in an e-mail from Nelson and distributed at the Palo Alto, California, news conference held by Tom Biscardi, host of a weekly online radio show about the Bigfoot.
Also present were Matthew Whitton and Rick Dyer, the two who say they discovered the Bigfoot corpse while hiking in the woods of northern Georgia. They also are co-owners of a company that offers Bigfoot merchandise.
Despite the dubious photo and the commercial interests of the alleged discoverers, the Bigfoot claim drew interest from Australia to Europe and even The New York Times.
Biscardi said the DNA samples may not have been taken correctly and may have been contaminated, and that he would proceed with an autopsy of the alleged Bigfoot remains, currently in a freezer at an undisclosed location.
(Reporting by Clare Baldwin in Palo Alto; writing by Jim Christie; editing by Mary Milliken and Peter Henderson)
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
| Please read our terms of use policy. |
ARCHIVES
-
►
2013
(92)
- ► April 2013 (19)
- ► March 2013 (17)
- ► February 2013 (5)
- ► January 2013 (36)
-
►
2012
(349)
- ► December 2012 (20)
- ► November 2012 (45)
- ► October 2012 (27)
- ► September 2012 (9)
- ► August 2012 (32)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (25)
- ► February 2012 (24)
- ► January 2012 (52)
-
►
2011
(175)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (10)
- ► October 2011 (20)
- ► September 2011 (8)
- ► August 2011 (14)
- ► April 2011 (10)
- ► March 2011 (18)
- ► February 2011 (23)
- ► January 2011 (9)
-
►
2010
(251)
- ► December 2010 (23)
- ► November 2010 (11)
- ► October 2010 (28)
- ► September 2010 (15)
- ► August 2010 (19)
- ► April 2010 (7)
- ► March 2010 (7)
- ► February 2010 (23)
- ► January 2010 (46)
-
►
2009
(144)
- ► December 2009 (29)
- ► November 2009 (23)
- ► October 2009 (23)
- ► September 2009 (14)
- ► August 2009 (8)
- ► April 2009 (10)
- ► March 2009 (10)
- ► February 2009 (2)
- ► January 2009 (10)
-
▼
2008
(91)
- ► December 2008 (7)
- ► November 2008 (3)
- ► October 2008 (1)
- ► September 2008 (5)
-
▼
August 2008
(15)
- Bigfoot Duo’s New Discovery: A Lawsuit Against The...
- Japan Yeti Hunters Hope 3rd Time's a Charm
- Darn Good Bigfoot Research
- 'There's something out there,' Sasquatch expert te...
- "Bigfoot" fails DNA test
- CNN Coverage of Bf Press Conference
- We Got Their Attention. Now What?
- Captured Bf Body Pics Analyzed
- BfRLC Scoops all Media
- Official Georgia Gorilla Press Release
- Update - Dead Bigfoot Pictures Now Online, Press C...
- Bf Corpse Discovered in Georgia
- Bigfoot Researchers Unite for Rick Emerson Address...
- Neandertal DNA Deciphered
- Bigfoot group has busy agenda
- ► April 2008 (3)
- ► March 2008 (8)
- ► February 2008 (15)
- ► January 2008 (14)
-
►
2007
(2)
- ► December 2007 (2)

Perhaps since chimps share 98% of human DNA, a bigfoot might have a much higher percentage of shared DNA, say 99.5%. Would a DNA test look human??? Also could the opposum DNA been picked up from a hair or did the bigfoot eat opposum recently, ie even as carrion???
ReplyDelete